IFRS 13 Fair Value real estate Morocco — practical application
IFRS 13 frames real estate fair value evaluation for IFRS-reporting Moroccan entities — OPCI, listed REITs, IFRS consolidating corporates. Practical application, inputs hierarchy, articulation with IVS 104 and RICS Red Book Global Standards 2025.
IFRS 13 Fair Value definition convergent with IVS 104 Market Value — a single RICS Red Book report satisfies both. The challenge: documenting the inputs hierarchy and the methodology.
Definition and IVS 104 convergence
« The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. » Conceptually convergent with IVS 104 Market Value. For most real estate assets, a RICS Red Book report meets IFRS 13 requirements.
IFRS 13 inputs hierarchy
Level 1: quoted prices in active market for identical asset. Almost never applicable to real estate. Level 2: directly or indirectly observable inputs for similar assets — comparable transactions, documented per-sqm prices, observed market rents. Level 3: unobservable inputs — internal models (DCF, operational hypotheses). Most Moroccan real estate evaluations fall in Level 3 due to limited liquidity. Annexes must publish portfolio distribution by level and document Level 3 methods.
Method choice and frequency
Three RICS approaches authorised: market approach (comparable) for liquid standard assets; income approach (DCF or direct capitalisation) for leased assets; cost approach (DRC VPGA 5) for bespoke assets rarely traded. Method must be coherent with asset nature and maximise observable inputs. Reconciliation between methods documented. Frequency: retail OPCI semi-annual minimum, often quarterly; reserved OPCI / non-listed REIT semi-annual or annual; listed REIT semi-annual; IFRS corporate annual at each close.
Mandatory annex content
Portfolio distribution between Levels 1, 2, 3. Method descriptions and key hypotheses (cap rate, rent growth, vacancy). Sensitivity analysis on significant parameters. Reconciliation with previous evaluation. External expert identification. Valuation date and bases of value retained.
- Method coherent with asset family
- Inputs hierarchy documented per asset
- Sensitivity disclosed in annex
- Previous valuation reconciliation
- External expert designated
- Valuation date specified
- Charter Moroccan and RICS Red Book references
- Single method without cross-check
- Level 3 inputs not justified
- Sensitivity analysis absent
- Comparable sources undocumented
FAQ
What's the difference between IFRS 13 Fair Value and IVS 104 Market Value?
Conceptually convergent — both target exchange value in arm's length transaction. Subtle differences exist (IVS notion of 'proper marketing' more explicit) but practically a RICS Red Book report meets both standards.
What level of IFRS 13 hierarchy applies to a Moroccan office building?
Typically Level 3 — internal DCF model with operational hypotheses. Level 2 inputs (comparable transactions) used as cross-check but rarely sufficient as primary input due to limited Moroccan institutional segment liquidity.
Related reading
- IVS 104 Market Value — definition
- OPCI Morocco — valuation IFRS 13
- IFRS 13 Fair Value real estate Morocco — OPCI
👉 Our service : IFRS 13 compliant appraisal.
📚 All our articles : real estate insights blog.
IFRS 13 reporting support?
RICS Red Book + IFRS 13 compliant report. From MAD 3,500 excl. VAT.
Request a quote →