
A report does not become false as it ages. It stays accurate — for its date. What moves is the distance between that date and today.
1. The real concept: the valuation date, not an expiry date
Most people picture a valuation as being “valid” for a certain number of months, like a certificate issued by an administration. That is the wrong frame. The core of a report prepared to RICS standards is its valuation date: the value adopted is the value of the property on that day, under the market conditions then prevailing, and on the basis of its physical condition as recorded at inspection.
The valuation date is a mandatory element of the report — one of the items that structure a serious deliverable, alongside the basis of value, the purpose, the scope of investigations and the stated assumptions. We set the full skeleton out in our note on the content and scope of a valuation report. The practical consequence is the one stated above: age does not make a report wrong, it makes it distant.
This is also why a valuation is read differently from a certificate. Its authority comes from being documented and verifiable line by line — a named basis of value, dated comparables, an adjustment grid a reader can rework. Those elements can be re-examined at any later date, which is precisely what allows an old report to be tested rather than simply trusted or discarded.
2. Why a report ages: three mechanics
If nothing fixes the life of a report in law, three mechanics nevertheless pull it away from current value:
- The market moves. The comparables that supported the value are themselves anchored to the valuation date. The more time passes, the further those references sit from present conditions of supply and demand in the sector.
- The asset changes. A property is never static: works, deterioration, a letting granted, a vacancy, damage. The condition recorded at the original inspection may no longer describe what exists.
- The regulatory framework evolves. A change of zoning, a new easement or a modification of permitted use can transform the potential of a plot or a building — and therefore its value.
Which is why the useful question is not “how many months?” but “what has changed since the valuation date?” Two reports of identical age can stand in completely different positions: one on a stable asset in a stable district, one on a plot whose zoning has since been revised.
3. What the recipient expects: a usage requirement, not a universal rule
Where a report is being submitted to someone — an institution, a co-investor, an auditor, a counterparty in a transaction — it is the recipient who sets the freshness requirement. That requirement varies from one organisation to another and with the type of file; there is no uniform rule that binds everybody. One principle nevertheless dominates: the more recent the report, the more readily it is used, because it sits closer to the market conditions of the day.
Two situations call for care. The first is a file that stretches out over time, so that a report commissioned at the start is presented at the end. The second is the reuse of a report originally prepared for a different purpose — a valuation is addressed to a client for a stated purpose, and transferring it to another use is not automatic. In both cases the house rule is the same: confirm what the recipient expects before instructing, so the exercise is not commissioned twice.
4. Events that overtake a report before time does
A recent report can be overtaken overnight by any of the following. Conversely, an older report on a stable asset in a stable market can remain relevant for a good deal longer. The triggers that matter:
- Works, extension or renovation. Any change to the extent or the condition of the property undermines the description on which the value was built. Floor area gained, a refurbishment carried out — or conversely a deterioration — changes the basis of the exercise.
- A change of zoning or of permitted use. Buildable potential and permitted use are major determinants of value, above all for land. A revision of the development plan can reset the position entirely.
- A new easement, damage or a dispute. An easement burdening the property, an event affecting its condition, or a dispute opened over it all change what a willing buyer would pay.
- A change in the letting position. A letting granted, an occupier leaving, prolonged vacancy: on an income-producing asset, the rent and the occupancy bear directly on the value.
- A shift in the local market. A clear change in market conditions in the sector pulls the original comparables away from present reality — the point at which the evidence base, not just the figure, needs revisiting.
The useful habit: have the currency checked before reusing a report
Before putting a report in front of a counterparty, a notary, a co-owner or a board, check two things: the valuation date stated in the report, and the list of events since — works, zoning, market, occupancy. If nothing has moved, the report keeps its relevance for most uses. If something has, or if the intended recipient wants a recent document, submit the existing report to your valuer: he will say whether an update is enough or a fresh inspection is required. That is usually faster and cheaper than starting again. At ReaConsult the quote is firm within 24 hours and the report delivered in 5 to 8 days, 48-72 hours on the express service.
5. Update or redo? The decision rule
The answer follows the scale of what has changed since the valuation date:
- An update will do — where the asset itself has not moved and only time has passed. The valuer works from the existing file, refreshes the market analysis, and confirms or adjusts the value at a new valuation date. The description, the tenure position and the methodology carry over; the evidence is renewed.
- A fresh instruction is required — where the asset has changed (works, damage, occupancy), where the framework has changed (zoning, easement, permitted use), or where the market has clearly turned. A new inspection and a new set of comparables are then indispensable, because the elements being carried over are precisely the ones that have moved.
In either case the right starting point is to submit the existing report. Rather than assume it is “too old” or “still fine”, let a RICS-certified expert decide against your actual use. Where the timetable is tight, an update on an existing file is the fastest route available — the constraints of a compressed instruction are set out in our note on urgent valuations delivered in 48 to 72 hours.
6. What this looks like from the outside: the reader's test
For an investor, an auditor or any third party being asked to rely on a Moroccan valuation, the currency question resolves into three checks that take a minute each:
- Is the valuation date stated, and distinct from the date of the report? They are two different things. A report signed in March can properly state a value at a January date; what is not acceptable is leaving the reader to guess which is which.
- Are the comparables dated? Evidence without dates cannot be tested for currency, and dated evidence tells the reader immediately how deep the market was at the time.
- Are the assumptions the kind that expire? An assumption about occupancy, about a pending permission or about works to be completed has a life of its own. The report should say what it assumed and what happens to the value if the assumption fails.
A report that passes those checks can be relied on with a clear view of its limits — and updated cheaply when the limits start to bind. The wider reading grid, section by section, is set out in our guide to reading a valuation report.
7. The short version
- No legal expiry for a private report — but a valuation date that fixes the value at a moment in time.
- Freshness requirements are set by the recipient and vary; confirm the expectation before instructing.
- What dates a report is change, not the calendar: works, zoning, easements, occupancy, a turn in the market.
- Update or redo is decided by the scale of that change, not by the age of the document.
- The reflex: have the currency of your report assessed against your actual use rather than presumed.
A private valuation informs a decision and an arm's-length negotiation. Our reports are prepared by RICS-certified experts and comply with Red Book standards; their conclusions rest on named assumptions, cited sources and a stated methodology, which makes them contestable point by point rather than defensible in a block.
Fees start at 3,500 MAD excl. tax for standard assets, with a firm quote within 24 hours and delivery in 5 to 8 days, 48-72 hours on the express service. ReaConsult has been advising owners, investors and institutional clients since 2019, with more than 5,000 valuations completed, offices in 6 cities and a rating of 4.9/5 across 47 reviews.
Holding a report you are not sure is still current? Send it over — we will tell you whether an update suffices or a fresh inspection is needed.
Request a valuation →Related articles
Note:this article explains the concept of the valuation date and the factors that affect how long a report remains relevant. There is no single documented validity period: freshness requirements are a matter for each recipient and each use — confirm your own position with the intended recipient and with your valuer. A private valuation informs a decision and an arm's-length negotiation. To instruct us or to have an existing report reviewed, see our contact page or the property blog.